Sunday, November 11, 2007

WATERBOARD BUSH AND CHENEY

In the mid 1960's, I was a Peace Corps volunteer in Brazil. This was at the height of the American-sponsored military dictatorship in that country. During that period, many people who were opposed to the military simply disappeared and many others were detained without habeas corpus and experienced torture. This was not a secret. Everyone in Brazil and the world outside of Brazil knew what was up.

The ideological self justification of the military was anti-communism and the Cold War. They were fighting against radical terrorists who were threatening the order of things (meaning the very wealthy and landowning oligarchs).

Naive Peace Corps volunteer that I was, I believed that the U.S. supported the Brazilian military but that we ourselves would never practice torture on opponents. Of course, Brazilian slums in the state of Pernambuco were a long way from Viet Nam and it was way too easy just to remain ignorant of what our troops might be doing over there. So I was permitted a
smugness that more or less persisted in my mind until post 9/11 and the resulting huge flow of information on how our own government, in the name of another big ideological struggle, deals with detainees.

During the past several weeks, I have become very alarmed by pronouncements from government officials regarding torture. Calling waterboarding anything other than torture seems to me just to engage in games of opportunistic euphemisms. I was surprised, as were many other Americans, to learn that the candidate for attorney general of the United States (subsequently confirmed) stated that he didn't know whether or not waterboarding constituted torture. President Bush himself states that the U.S. simply does not practice torture but that we do waterboard. This week there were many media interviews of persons who have administered waterboarding to detainees and even our own soldiers. At least one of these persons stated that the method, sometimes euphemistically termed "simulated drowning" was in fact torture. He mentioned that it is a method that was used in the Inquisition.

My proposal is this: Since there are soldiers and other government officials dealing with waterboarding who must undergo the experience themselves and since the Bush administration asserts that this is not really torture, why not demonstrate the benign nature of it all by publicly undergoing the exercise. Yes, I invite Bush and Cheney to undergo waterboarding and then I will listen, maybe, to what the have to say. Since they consider it relatively harmless, they might consider it just another day's work, say, something like taking a flu shot as an example fo the American public.

Hey, George and Dick, what about it?

P.S. A final thought: It seems to me a very short jump from waterboarding foreign detainees for whatever reason and finding that this is an acceptable practice within the United States on Americans themselves. Just a pause for thought . . . . . . . .

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Just another example of how the Democrats have completely failed. It should be noted that both Obama and Clinton did not actually vote against Mukasey's confirmation; they declined to vote:

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfmcongress=110&session=1&vote=00407

Anonymous said...

Waterboard the sick sons of bitches! Actually, I'd rather see them drawn and quartered. We could make it a MONDAY NIGHT SPECTACLE!

Anonymous said...

Your blog keeps getting better and better! Your older articles are not as good as newer ones you have a lot more creativity and originality now keep it up!